Daily digest for Gupta Chandan & Associates, on January 15, 2021

posted: "INCOME TAX : Where assessee was under jurisdiction of Bangalore, merely because post search settlement application was filed by assessee before Chennai Bench of Settlement Commission, order passed by Chennai Bench of Settlement Commission could not be cha" New post on Gupta Chandan & Associates Assessee having Bangalore jurisdiction couldn't challenge order of Chennai Set com before Madras HC INCOME TAX : Where assessee was under jurisdiction of Bangalore, merely because post search settlement application was filed by assessee before Chennai Bench of Settlement Commission, order passed by Chennai Bench of Settlement Commission could not be challenged before Madras High CourtINCOME TAX : Where assessee was under jurisdiction of Bangalore, merely because post search […] Read more of this post January 15, 2021 at 12:00 am | Categories: Latest Case Laws, News | URL: https://wp.me/pcenIR-NG Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Gupta Chandan & Associates. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://www.guptachandanassociates.com/news/assessee-having-bangalore-jurisdiction-couldnt-challenge-order-of-chennai-set-com-before-madras-hc/

posted: "INCOME TAX : Where Assessing Officer mechanically applied provisions of section 56(2) to difference between stamp duty value and actual sale consideration paid by assessee and made additions, without making any efforts to find out actual cost of property," New post on Gupta Chandan & Associates Additions made u/s 56(2) without determining actual cost of immovable property was unjustified INCOME TAX : Where Assessing Officer mechanically applied provisions of section 56(2) to difference between stamp duty value and actual sale consideration paid by assessee and made additions, without making any efforts to find out actual cost of property, additions made by Assessing Officer were to be set asideINCOME TAX : Where Assessing Officer mechanically […] Read more of this post January 15, 2021 at 12:00 am | Categories: Latest Case Laws, News | URL: https://wp.me/pcenIR-NF Comment    See all comments Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Gupta Chandan & Associates. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions. Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://www.guptachandanassociates.com/news/additions-made-u-s-562-without-determining-actual-cost-of-immovable-property-was-unjustified/